‎SPLM-IO Rejects Special Court as Puot Kang Testifies in Nasir Case ‎

Image
The SPLM/A-IO has again criticized the Special Court investigating the Nasir incident after Petroleum Minister Puot Kang Chol completed his testimony during the court’s 83rd session on Wednesday. ‎ ‎The court, which is hearing a case involving First Vice President Dr. Riek Machar and several SPLM/A-IO officials, spent the session cross-examining Puot Kang over statements he made during previous hearings. ‎ ‎During his testimony, Puot denied allegations that he financed or supported armed youth involved in the Nasir violence.  ‎ He also challenged evidence presented by the prosecution, particularly findings from a digital forensic report that allegedly linked him to communications connected to the conflict. ‎ ‎Puot told the court that he had been arrested by the National Security Service (NSS) in March 2025 and that several vehicles belonging to him and the government were later seized.  ‎ He said he could not recall the vehicle registration numbers but maintained that the info...

South Sudan Lawyer: If President Kiir Bans South Sudan National Anthem Let Him Ban South Sudan Flag Too


One of the South Sudanese lawyers said that President Salva Kiir should also ban The South Sudanese flag which can be seen everywhere in the country.  

The anonymous lawyer also responded to South Sudan Information Minister remarks in which Hon. Makuei said only embassies and schools will the national anthem be allowed.  

In his own words the anonymous lawyer said that “If he [President Kiir] wants to ban the national anthem from being sung in his absence, let him ban all the flags from wherever they are. That means we won’t have flags in offices, in schools and the small flags people buy in streets during independence.”
 
The lawyer also added that “Just like you here, “national anthem” is for the nation, which means each of everybody in that nation owns it. So it’s for everybody. It’s not personal. To me, he’s personalizing the anthem. We have grown in different countries and we see national anthem is sang by everyone in Schools, meetings. So by not singing it in his absence, which means people will not have a symbol of their nation. So it doesn’t make sense to me. So if he bans it, which means he is banning the citizens from accessing what belongs to them.”

 “As a citizen of South Sudan, it is not fair. We need freedom of expression. We even need the young ones to know their national anthem. But now if he’s stopping it from being sang in his absence, how will the young ones know their citizenship”, the citizen raises her concerns.
 
Kindly your views and opinions will be appreciated. 

Comments

  1. It's crazy and we will never developed with search leaders where is the nation heading does it mean south Sudan is for kiir and his tribe members am sorry

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good opinion... Time will tell everything.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

President Salva Kiir Mayardit Orders Enhanced Security in Central Equatoria State Ahead of Elections ‎

Senior Presidential Envoy For Special Programs: Adut Donates 10 Vehicles to Strengthen South Sudan’s Ebola Preparedness

U.S. Blames Kiir for Slow Peace Implementation as UN Extends Sanctions on South Sudan